Alfred McZeal Jr. v. HSBC Bank USA National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20232:23-cv-03088California2,547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENCTIRVAILL DMIISNTURTICETS O– FG CEANLEIRFAOLR NIA

Alfred McZeal, et al. v. HSBC Bank USA, et al. Case No. 2:23-cv-03088-DMG-PD Date: September 6, 2023 Title Present: The Honorable: Patricia Donahue, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Isabel Verduzco N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why the First Amended Complaint Should Not be Dismissed

I. Procedural History and Summary of Factual Allegations

On April 24, 2023, Plaintiffs Alfred McZeal, Jr., Jose R. Solano, Vien Thi-Ho, Yesenia Del Toro, Veronica Ponder Waters, Geddes Sean Gibbs, Natalie Langley-Gibbs, Rene Del Prado, and Desmond Demontegnac (collectively “Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“the Complaint”). [Dkt. No. 1.] On May 24, 2023, the Court screened the Complaint and ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why the Court should not recommend dismissal of this action for failure to state actionable claims. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.