Sharrod Moten v. Pedro Pulido

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20232:22-cv-04942California902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-04942-DOC (SP) Date September 6, 2023 Title SHARROD MOTEN v. PEDRO PULIDO, et al.

Present: The Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge Honorable Kimberly I. Carter None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Denying Purported Motions for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction [81, 82] Plaintiff filed what purport to be a Motion for a Permanent Injunction on CDCR on July 31, 2023 (docket no. 81), and a Motion for Temporary and Preliminary Injunction on August 1, 2023 (docket no. 82). The motions are identical apart from their titles, and they do not in fact request any particular injunctive relief. A preliminary injunction is “an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972, 117 S. Ct. 1865, 138 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1997) (per curiam) (internal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.