Francisco Aceves v. Subaru of America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20232:23-cv-02953California1,412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 FRANCISCO ACEVES, an individual, Case No. 2:23-cv-02953-JAK-MRW 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [11] v.

SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, and DOES

through 10, inclusive,

Defendant.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Francisco Aceves’ (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand

(the “Motion”). (Mot. to Remand, Docket No. 11). On June 9, 2023, Defendant Subaru of America, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Subaru”) filed its Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion. (Def.’s Opp’n, Docket No. 14). On August 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Reply. (Reply, Docket No. 17). This matter has been fully briefed. No party filed a written request for oral argument stating that an attorney with five years or less of experience would be arguing the matter. See Standing Order for Newly Assigned Civil Cases at 15. Further, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.