Magdalina Kalincheva v. UA RICO Valentyna

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20232:23-cv-06395California888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-06395-MCS-RAO Date September 8, 2023 Title Kalincheva vy. Valentyna

Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge

Stephen Montes Kerr —__——NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) REMAND ORDER

The Court ordered Magdalina Kalincheva to show cause why this case should not be remanded for want of subject-matter jurisdiction or dismissed or transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California due to improper venue. (OSC, ECF No. 13.) The Court ordered Kalincheva to submit a written response along with “‘a copy of all state process, pleadings, and orders’ from the state court case.” (/d. at 2 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a)).) Kalincheva filed a written response. (Resp., ECF No. 17.) She also submitted voluminous records from the Kern County Superior Court proceeding from which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.