Augustine Ramirez v. El Nuevo Corral Nightclub

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20232:21-cv-04732California2,485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 AGUSTIN RAMIREZ et al., Case № 2:21-cv-04732-ODW (GJSx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

v.

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO

14 EL NUEVO CORRAL NIGHTCLUB et DEFENDANTS SIMON SEGUNDO 15 al., DBA CHICO MALO

Defendants. PRODUCTIONS, MARISCOS

TAMPICO BAR & GRILL, JUAN

MANUEL NAVARRO, AND OK

CORRAL EVENT CENTER [62, 63]

18 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Agustin Ramirez, Agustin Ramirez, Jr., and Anthony Ramirez move 21 for entry of default judgment against Defendants Simon Segundo dba Chico Malo 22 Productions (“Simon Segundo”), Mariscos Tampico Bar & Grill, Juan Manuel 23 Navarro, and OK Corral Event Center. (Mots. Default J. (“Motions” or “Mots.”), ECF 24 Nos. 62, 63.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motions.1 25 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.