Adolfo Valdez v. Ralph T. Warner
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ll ADOLEFQ VALDEZ, Case No. 5:22-cv-01021-FWS-JC Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
V. DISMISSING ACTION 14 RALPH T. WARNER, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 I. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
On June 16, 2022, Plaintiff Adolfo Valdez, who is in custody, is proceeding pro 21 se and has been granted leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (“IFP’’), 22 filed a Civil Rights Complaint (“Complaint”). (Docket Nos. 1, 2, 4). As Plaintiff is in custody and is proceeding IFP, the Magistrate Judge screened 25 || the Complaint to determine if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim 26 on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is 28 || immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A.
On July 7, 2022, the Magistrate Judge dismissed the Complaint with leave to 2 amend (“July Order”) because the Complaint was deficient in multiple…