Theresa Brooke v. 12828 Mob LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20232:23-cv-06232California785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA BROOKE, No. 2:23-cv-06232-JAK (Ex) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION v. OVER STATE-LAW CLAIM 13 12828 MOB LLC, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Based on a review of the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the following determinations are made: The Complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”) and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. Supplemental jurisdiction is the basis for the Unruh Act claim. Dkt. 1 ¶ 6. District courts may exercise “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). This “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.