Jane Doe v. MindGeek USA Incorporated
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20238:21-cv-00338California1,924 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, on behalf of herself and CASE NO. 8:21-CV-00338-CJC- all others similarly situated, ADS Plaintiff, [DISCOVERY DOCUMENT: v. REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE AUTUMN D. SPAETH]
MINDGEEK USA INCORPORATED,
MINDGEEK S.A.R.L., MG Judicial Officer: Cormac J. Carney
FREESITES, LTD (D/B/A
PORNHUB), MG FREESITES II, PRE-TRIAL PROTECTIVE
LTD, MG CONTENT RT LIMITED, ORDER AS TO THE IDENTITY
AND 9219-1568 QUEBEC, INC. OF PLAINTIFF JANE DOE (D/B/A MINDGEEK), 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Plaintiff is a victim of child sex trafficking and child pornography. The
Court previously approved Plaintiff’s request to proceed under a pseudonym in this
litigation. Dkt. 54. Plaintiff seeks a protective order governing the circumstances
and terms by which her identity (and the identity of any future named plaintiffs) may
be disclosed to and by…