Jane Doe v. MindGeek USA Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20238:21-cv-00338California1,924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, on behalf of herself and CASE NO. 8:21-CV-00338-CJC- all others similarly situated, ADS Plaintiff, [DISCOVERY DOCUMENT: v. REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE AUTUMN D. SPAETH]

MINDGEEK USA INCORPORATED,

MINDGEEK S.A.R.L., MG Judicial Officer: Cormac J. Carney

FREESITES, LTD (D/B/A

PORNHUB), MG FREESITES II, PRE-TRIAL PROTECTIVE

LTD, MG CONTENT RT LIMITED, ORDER AS TO THE IDENTITY

AND 9219-1568 QUEBEC, INC. OF PLAINTIFF JANE DOE (D/B/A MINDGEEK), 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Plaintiff is a victim of child sex trafficking and child pornography. The

Court previously approved Plaintiff’s request to proceed under a pseudonym in this

litigation. Dkt. 54. Plaintiff seeks a protective order governing the circumstances

and terms by which her identity (and the identity of any future named plaintiffs) may

be disclosed to and by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.