Broque Anthony Anderson v. San Bernardino Sheriffs Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BROQUE ANTHONY Case No. 5:22-cv-01586-JAK-KES
ANDERSON,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SAN BERNARDINO SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 31). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which objections (Dkt. 33) have been made. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. In his objections, Plaintiff argued that his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims alleging he was arrested for trespassing without probable cause are not barred by Heck v. 28 Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994) because his trespassing…