Broque Anthony Anderson v. San Bernardino Sheriffs Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20235:22-cv-01586California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BROQUE ANTHONY Case No. 5:22-cv-01586-JAK-KES

ANDERSON,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SAN BERNARDINO SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 31). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which objections (Dkt. 33) have been made. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. In his objections, Plaintiff argued that his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims alleging he was arrested for trespassing without probable cause are not barred by Heck v. 28 Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994) because his trespassing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.