Eduardo Zarco v. California Highway Patrol

1 O 2

4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 EDUARDO ZARCO, Case No. CV 22-00594-MEMF (AS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND v.

RECOMMNEDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL,

15 et, al., 16 Defendants. 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Eduardo Zarco (“Zarco”), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. In sum, Zarco’s Objections do not 24 25 26 27 28 cause the Court to reconsider its decision to accept the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions and recommendations.1 3 IT IS ORDERED that (1) Zarco’s claims against Defendant California Highway Patrol and the individual defendants in their official capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (2) Zarco’s…