Michael George Bettasso v. Rick Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20235:21-cv-01925California1,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No. 5:21-cv-01925-FWS-SHK

MICHAEL GEORGE BETTASSO, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND

Petitioner, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE v.

RICK HILL, ACTING WARDEN,

Respondent.

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. Introduction and Relevant Procedural History

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s July 31, 2023, Report and Recommendation (“Report and Recommendation”), (Dkt. 24), regarding the claims of Petitioner George Michael Bettasso (“Petitioner”), as stated in the Petitioner’s Verified First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ( “Amended Petition”), (Dkt. 14-2). Based on the state of the record, as applied to the applicable law, the court adopts the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge, including each of the findings of fact and conclusions of law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.