Ricky Montes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20232:22-cv-02551California2,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY MONTES, Case No. 2:22-cv-02551-FLA (Ex)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 [DKT. 20] AND MOTION TO

STATE FARM MUTUAL

REMAND [DKT. 19]

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

18 RULING Before the court are Plaintiff Ricky Montes’ (“Plaintiff” or “Montes”) Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings to File a Second Amended Complaint (“Motion to Amend,” Dkt. 20) and Motion for Remand (Dkt. 19). Defendants State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm Automobile”) and State Farm General Insurance Company (“State Farm General”) (collectively, “Defendants” or “State Farm”) oppose the Motions. Dkts. 24, 25. On November 15, 2022, the court found these matters appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for November 18, 2022. Dkt. 32; see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.