Edmond Neal v. Pacific Capital LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-05367-MEMF-BFMx EDMOND NEAL, Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO
v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S
STATE LAW CLAIMS PACIFIC CAPITAL, LLC; and DOES 1 15 through 10, Defendants. 17 18 19 On July 5, 2023, Plaintiff Edmond Neal filed a Complaint against Defendant Pacific Capital, LLC, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 19955, et seq.; and (5)a claim for negligence. ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleges…