Annette Cody v. P.C. Richard and Son Service Company, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—
GENERAL
Case No. 2:23-cv-03438-SSS-KKx Date September 18, 2023 Title Annette Cody v. P.C. Richards and Son Service Company, Inc.
Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
MATTER SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED
Federal district courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party.” Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006). “Lack of subject matter jurisdiction may [] be raised by the district court sua sponte.” Allen v. Santa Clara Cnty. Correctional Peace Officers Ass’n, 400 F. Supp. 3d 998, 1001 (E.D. Cal 2019) (citing Ruhgrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999)). If at any time before final judgment the district court determines it lacks subject matter jurisdiction…