Cindy Osuna v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20232:22-cv-07960California4,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 || CINDY OSUNA, Case No. 2:22-cv-07960-ODW-PVCx Plaintiff, o STIPULATED PROTECTIVE z V. ORDER 14|| TARGET CORPORATION, an entity < unknown; DAVID RICO, an individual; = 15 || and DOES through 50, inclusive, Defendants. seme 18 ]} 1. INTRODUCTION 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 || proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 22 || disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may ||be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 24 || enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 25 || Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 26 || discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.