Martha Cristerna v. FedEx Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20232:23-cv-05180California3,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

The Court recounted the facts giving rise to this action in a previous Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. (See Ex. 55 to Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Order Dated April 5, 2023 at 55-1–55-3, Doc. 1-5.) In brief, Cristerna was employed by FedEx Corporation and Federal Express Corporation in October 2020 as a Shuttle Driver. (Id. at 55-1.) She had an accident at work on February 23, 2021. (Id. at 55-2.) Her injury required her to take medical leave and have surgery, but complications with the ______________________________________________________________________________

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-05180-JLS-MAA Date: September 25, 2023 Title: Cristerna v. FedEx Corp., et al.

that she had to return to work or apply for another available position within the company before her leave expired at the end of August. (Id.) She asked for light duty in her old position as Shuttle Driver, but was told no light duty position was available. (Id.) Cristerna did not return to work or apply for another position and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.