22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T406,UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TIMOTHY ORLANDO POTTS, Case No. 2:21-CV-06908-ODW (SK) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Vv. AND RECOMMENDATION TO TERESA CISNEROS, Warden, DENY HABEAS PETITION Respondent. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation to deny the habeas petition and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DENIED. Judgment will accordingly be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 26, 2023 fo OTIS D. WRIGHT, II U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE24:T435,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY ORLANDO POTTS, Case No. 2:21-CV-06908-ODW (SK) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Vv. AND RECOMMENDATION TO TERESA CISNEROS, Warden, DENY HABEAS PETITION

Respondent.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation to deny the habeas petition and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DENIED. Judgment will accordingly be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 26, 2023 fo

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE