ML Products Inc. v. Ninestar Technology Co. LTD.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20235:21-cv-01930California2,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

2 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ML PRODUCTS INC., Case No.: 5:21-cv-01930-MEMF-KK

11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT V4INK v. INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH [ECF NO. 75]

NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.;

NINESTAR CORP.; ASTER GRAPHICS,

INC.; BILLIONTREE TECHNOLOGY USA,

INC.; MOUNTAIN PEAK, INC.; V4INK INC.; and DOES 1 through 125, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18

20 Before the Court is the Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint filed by 21 Defendant V4Ink Inc. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion to Quash 22 Service of Summons and Complaint.

24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / /

28 I. Background A. Factual Background1 3 On November 12, 2021, Plaintiff ML Products Inc. (“ML Products”) filed its Complaint, 4 ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”) and commenced this action. On November 16, 2021, ML Products filed its 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint for each individual Defendant, including V4Ink 6 Inc. (“V4Ink”). ECF No. 13. On November 17, 2021, the Clerk of Court issued 21 Day Summons as 7 to all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.