CARMEL STEVENS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20232:22-cv-06362California1,789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARMEL STEVENS, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-06362-FLA (MAAx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

14 STATE FARM MUTUAL, INC., et al., Defendants.

17 RULING On July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs Carmel Stevens and Ladale Jackson (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this action against Defendants State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm General Insurance Company (“Defendants”)1 and DOES 1 through 50 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 6, Ex. A (“Compl.”). The Complaint alleges causes of action for negligence and violations of California’s Unfair Competition law, the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), and California Insurance Code § 10140. Id. Plaintiffs seek actual damages, statutory damages, and

27 1 In the Complaint, Defendants were erroneously sued as State Farm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.