Armen Minassian v. Josef Essavi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20232:23-cv-06603California1,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMEN MINASSIAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-06603-FLA (AJRx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND

DENYING DEFENDANT’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION TO

JOSEF ESSAVI, et al. CONTINUE HEARING DATE Defendants. [DKTS. 11, 14]

28 RULING Before the court is Plaintiff Armen Minassian’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand (the “Motion”). Dkt. 11 (“Mot.”). Defendant Josef Essavi (“Defendant”) opposes the Motion. Dkt. 13 (“Opp’n”). Also before the court is Defendant’s ex parte application to continue hearing date. Dkt. 14. The court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacates the hearing set for October 6, 2023. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Rule 7- 15. For the reasons stated herein, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.