Kristi Hazard v. Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20232:23-cv-07629California765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-7629 PA (MRWx) Date September 27, 2023 Title Kristi Hazard v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER Kristi Hazard, as parent and legal guardian of P.H., a minor (“Plaintiff”) has commenced an action for personal injuries against defendant Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc. (“J&J”). Plaintiff alleges that Plaintiff was exposed to benzene through the use of sunscreen including “Neutrogena Beach Defense Aerosol Sunscreen, and Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Aerosol Sun screen.” (Compl. 4 7.) According to the Complaint, “Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., is the manufacturer and/or distributor of the adulterated sunscreens, and is the parent company of Neutrogena Corporation.” (Compl. 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.