Liliana Gallagher v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20235:23-cv-01690California1,784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

This is a premises liability action, concerning Plaintiff Liliana Gallagher’s injury on the premises of Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walmart Inc., and Does 1 through 50 (collectively, “Defendants”). Notice of Removal (“Notice”) (Dkt. 1), see also Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt. 1–1). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed to ensure a tray of dog food cans were securely stocked on a shelf, which subsequently fell on Plaintiff’s head causing injury. See Complaint ¶ 8.

Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, on March 22, 2023. Compl. On July 21, 2023, Plaintiffs propounded their Statements of Damages on Defendants. Notice ¶ 4. On August 21, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this Court. See generally Notice.

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:23-cv-01690-DOC-MAR Date: September 28, 2023 Page

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Removal of a case from state court to federal court is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which provides in relevant part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.