E.K.B.

E.K.B. v. City of Azusa

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20232:23-cv-01067California5,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E.K.B., a minor, by and through his Case No. 2:23-CV-01067 SPG (JDEx) Guardian Ad Litem, Nakisha Mitchell; [District Judge: Sherilyn P. Garnett; NAKISHA MITCHELL, individually Magistrate Judge: John D. Early] and as Administrator of the Estate of 13 Jerome Rory Barber,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

PLAINTIFFS, ORDER

15 V. 16 CITY OF AZUSA, a public entity; MICHAEL BERTELSON, a public employee; Does 1-10, Inclusive, 18 Defendants.

21 Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 44) and for good cause shown, 22 the Court finds and orders as follows. 23 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 24 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 25 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the 1 Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 2 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.