Lala Maha Maqaddem v. People of the State of Calfornia

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20232:23-cv-07782California2,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-7782 DDP (PVC) Date: October 4, 2023 Title Maha El Pinto Maqaddem v. People of the State of California, et al.

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO THE YOUNGER ABSTENTION DOCTRINE

AND BECAUSE IT IS COMPLETELY UNEXHAUSTED

On February 27, 2022, Petitioner, a pretrial detainee in the custody of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department proceeding pro se, filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the Eastern District of California. (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1). On September 14, 2023, the case was transferred to this court. (Dkt. No. 2). The Petition raises two grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) false imprisonment; and (2) violation of freedom and civil rights. (Id. at 6). Petitioner contends that she is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.