Heralal A. Nandlal v. The State of California
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20232:23-cv-07352California2,189 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 23-7352 CBM (PVC) Date: October 4, 2023 Title Heralal Alexander Nandlal v. The State of California, et al.
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT
THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO THE YOUNGER ABSTENTION DOCTRINE
AND BECAUSE IT IS COMPLETELY UNEXHAUSTED
On September 5, 2023, Petitioner, a pretrial detainee housed at Metropolitan State Hospital, proceeding pro se, filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1). The Petition is a lengthy unintelligible diatribe on a number of subjects but appears to request that Petitioner be declared mentally competent to stand trial and be released from the Metropolitan State Hospital psychiatric ward. (See generally id.). To begin with, the Court lacks jurisdiction under § 2254. Federal habeas…