Anthony McDaniel v. Theresa Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20232:21-cv-08831California152 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY MCDANIEL, Case No. 2:21-cv-08831-CAS (SK) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Vv. AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DENY HABEAS PETITION

TERESA CISNEROS,

Respondent.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation to deny the habeas petition and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DENIED. Judgment will accordingly be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 3, 2023 / th Uo Pd A . J mgd

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE