Sanrio Company Ltd v. $avage Clothing LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20232:23-cv-06107California582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANRIO COMPANY LTD et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-06107-SB-AS

Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

$AVAGE CLOTHING LLC et al., PERSONAL JURISDICTION [DKT. NO. 17] Defendants.

Plaintiffs Sanrio Company Ltd and Sanrio Inc filed a lawsuit against Defendants $avage Clothing LLC and Michael Antonio Caruso alleging one claim for federal copyright infringement. Dkt. No. 1. After Defendants failed to respond or otherwise appear, Plaintiffs sought and the clerk entered default against Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 13, 14. Plaintiffs have moved for default judgment that is set to be heard on October 27, 2023. Dkt. No. 17. “In most circumstances, a defect in personal jurisdiction is a defense that may be asserted or waived by a party.” In re Tuli, 172 F.3d 707, 712 (9th Cir. 1999). But “[w]hen entry of judgment is sought against a party who has failed to plead or otherwise defend, a district court has an affirmative duty to look into its jurisdiction over both the subject matter and the parties.” Id. Whether specific personal jurisdiction exists is determined by a applying a three-part test: (1) The non-resident…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.