Gilkey

Gilkey v. L.A.P.D.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20232:22-cv-02817California4,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATWAQUE GILKEY, CASE NO. CV22-2817-MCS(RAO) Honorable Mark C. Scarsi Plaintiff, Honorable Rozella A. Oliver POLICE DEPARTMENT), PAUL EVIETH, a government 16 employee; LAPD OFFICER NAME UNKNOWN-I, a government employee;

LAPD OFFICER NAME UNKNOWN-2, a government employee;

LAPD OFFICER NAME

20 UNKNOWN-3, a government employee;

Defendants.

/ / /

/ / /

28 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.