Abrigo Castro v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20232:23-cv-01891California2,020 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABRIGO CASTRO, Case No. 2:23-cv-01891-FLA (RAOx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendant.

17

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULING On February 16, 2023, Plaintiff Jose Abrigo Castro (“Plaintiff” or “Abrigo Castro”) initiated this action against Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant” or “Ford”) in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 1-1. The Complaint alleges three causes of action for violation of the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the “Song-Beverly Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1970, et seq. Id. Plaintiff seeks actual damages, civil penalties, and attorney’s fees. Id. at 19.1 On March 14, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1 (“NoR”). In its Notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.