Jamal Mashat v. STV Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20232:22-cv-06268California217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAMAL AL MASHAT, et al., ) Case No. CV 22-6268 FMO (MARx) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE STV, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 36, Parties’ Notice of Settlement in Principle), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than thirty (30) days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.