Julia Wilson v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20235:23-cv-00708California1,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

Plaintiff initiated this action in Riverside County Superior Court on February 28, 2023. (Dkt. 1-2 (“Compl.”).) Plaintiff alleges she was employed by Defendant from approximately December 21, 2018, until March 4, 2021. (Id. ¶ 7.) Plaintiff alleges she worked for Defendant in multiple roles, including visual merchandiser, guest service team lead, and closing team lead, and received consistent promotions during her employment with Defendant. (Id. ¶ 8.)

Plaintiff became pregnant in or around late 2020. (Id. ¶ 9.) Plaintiff informed Defendant of the pregnancy and that Plaintiff had been diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum, a pregnancy-related disability characterized by excessive nausea and vomiting. (Id.) Plaintiff _____________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 5:23-cv-00708-FWS-KK Date: October 5, 2023 Title: Julia Wilson v. Target Corporation et al.

alleges her supervisor began to harass and make discriminatory comments almost immediately after learning of Plaintiff’s pregnancy, including telling Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.