Yuri Doering v. Angelina Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20232:23-cv-07004California900 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-07004-MEMF-SK YURI DOERING,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

ANGELINA BARR D/B/A SUNSHINE

DESIGNS FLOWER SHOP; KRYSTAL

ENTERPRISES LLC; and DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants.

On August 24, 2023, Plaintiff Yuri Doering filed a Complaint against Defendant Angelina

Barr and Defendant Krystal Enterprises LLC, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”); (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the California Health and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.