Richard R Lawless v. The Security & Exchange Commission
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20235:21-cv-01637California9,239 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICHARD R. LAWLESS, Case No. 5:21-cv-01637-JWH-SPx
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING:
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS [ECF. Nos. 105,
THE SECURITY & EXCHANGE 115, &121],
COMMISSION, PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO
DISMISS DEFENSE
Defendant. COUNSEL’S STATEMENTS [ECF Nos. 108 & 120],
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
REQUESTING RULINGS ON
DEFENSE COUNSEL
APPLICATIONS OF FOIA
EXEMPTIONS [ECF Nos. 109 & 118],
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO
RELEASE UNREDACTED
DOCUMENTS [ECF Nos. 110- 114, 116, 117, & 119], AND
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [ECF No. 129]
I. SUMMARY OF DECISION
Before the Court are 16 motions, all of which arise out of several Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) requests filed by pro se Plaintiff Richard Lawless. Lawless has filed 15 motions or amendments thereto, and Defendant Securities and Exchange Commission has moved for partial summary judgment.1 Each motion falls into one of three categories. First are the motions for sanctions, of which Lawless files three versions. Second, Lawless filed a…