Elijah Behringer v. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20235:23-cv-00934California160 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIJAH BEHRINGER, Case No. 5:23-CV-00934-JFW (SK) Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Vv. AND RECOMMENDATION TO

GRANT DEFENDANTS’

CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC MOTIONS TO DISMISS

STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (R&R) to grant Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF 34) and Plaintiffs Objections (ECF 35). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). None of the Objections—to the limited extent that they are even intelligible—has any merit. THEREFORE, the Court accepts the recommendation and orders that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss be GRANTED for the reasons stated in the R&R. Judgment will be entered accordingly dismissing the federal claims in the First Amended Complaint with prejudice and the state-law claims without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 16,2023 Ok Lhd

JOHN F. WALTER

nited States District Judge