Janet Hill v. Nexstar Media Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20232:23-cv-05617California1,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

Before the Court is a motion to remand the action back to state court. Dkt. 13. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED. IL. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Janet Hill (“Plaintiff”) filed this lawsuit against defendants Nexstar Media Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Jason Ball in Los Angeles Superior Court on May 27, 2020. Dkt. 1, Ex. A. Plaintiff worked at Nexstar for approximately 29 years. Jd. § 14. Ball was Plaintiff's direct supervisor from 2008 to 2021. Id. 16, 29. Plaintiff alleged seven causes of action against Nexstar related to employment discrimination, retaliation, and harassment. Jd. J] 41-98. Plaintiff alleged two causes of action against Ball: harassment in violation of California Government Code §12940(j)(1), et seq., and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Jd. 59-68, 92-98. Defendants removed the case on July 12, 2023. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff filed this motion to remand on August 9, 2023. Dkt. 13. Nexstar is a citizen of Delaware and Texas. Dkt. 15 at 1. It is undisputed that Plaintiff and Ball are both citizens of California. Dkt. 13 at 8; Dkt. 15 at 1. Nevertheless, defendants argue that removal is proper based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.