Hunter Nation v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20232:23-cv-07413California1,333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Hunter Nation filed a pro se, one-paragraph complaint against Defendant in California state-court. (Compl., Doc. 1-1 at 10). The complaint seeks $100 trillion in damages for injuries that “are emotional . . . and financial.” (Id.) Plaintiff checked a form-complaint box for “Intentional Tort” (id. at 9), but his one-paragraph complaint does not otherwise provide any guidance as to what causes of action he asserts or what bases he has to allege such an extraordinary amount of damages. Indeed, in a pending motion before this Court, Defendant describes Plaintiff’s complaint as “so vague, ambiguous, and unintelligible that Defendant . . . cannot determine its legal or factual ______________________________________________________________________________

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-07413-JLS-E Date: October 17, 2023 Title: Hunter Nation v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

bases.” (Mot. for More Definite Statement, Doc. 14 at 7.) Nonetheless, Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.