Annette Cody v. P.C. Richard and Son Service Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20232:23-cv-03438California4,284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS -6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-03438-SSS-KKx ANNETTE CODY, Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING CASE TO v. STATE COURT SUA SPONTE 14 P.C. RICHARD AND SON SERVICE

COMPANY, INC.,

16 Defendant. On September 18, 2023, the Court issued an order to show cause as to why the matter should not be remanded (the “OSC”). [Dkt. 31]. On September 29, 2023, Defendant P.C. Richard and Son Service Company, Inc., (“P.C. Richard”) filed its response to the OSC [Dkt. 32], and Plaintiff Annette Cody (“Cody”) filed her response in support of P.C. Richard’s response. [Dkt. 33]. This matter is fully briefed and ripe for review. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint at the time of removal and therefore REMANDS the case to state court. I. BACKGROUND On April 5, 2023, Cody filed a complaint against P.C. Richard in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.