Raushanah Holland v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20235:22-cv-01409California290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 5:22-cv-01409-SSS-SPx Date October 24, 2023 Title Raushanah Holland, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

On July 14, 2023, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint. [Dkt. 77]. On July 27, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a Proof of Service of Summons and Third Amended Complaint. [Dkt. 82]. Any required responsive pleading was due by August 17, 2023. As of today’s date, Defendant Lifeplan Children’s Services, Inc. has neither filed an answer or a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause in writing why Defendant Lifeplan Children’s Services, Inc. should not be dismissed from this action for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. Plaintiff must file its response by November 7, 2023. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.