David Perrigo v. Northrop Grumman Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20232:23-cv-07602California1,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CUENNTITREADL S DTIASTTERSIC DTI SOTFR CICATL ICFOOURRNTIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-7602-GW-SKx Date October 25, 2023 Title David Perrigo v. Northrop Grumman Corp., et al.

Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Javier Gonzalez None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER VACATING HEARING; DENYING

MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE

COURT

Plaintiff David Perrigo (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to remand this action to Santa Barbara County Superior Court, setting it for hearing on October 30, 2023. That hearing is vacated. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. The motion is denied for the reasons expressed below. The principal basis for Plaintiff’s motion is that removal was allegedly untimely. That is not correct. The original Complaint in the action did not reveal all material necessary for the case to be removed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction (the basis for the removal here, see Notice of Removal ¶¶ 5, 10-17). It contained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.