Victor Diaz Sandoval v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20235:22-cv-01319California3,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTOR DIAZ SANDOVAL, Case No.: 5:22-CV-01319-MEMF (GJSx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 39]

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; DAVID HOLM;

and DOES 1-20,

15 Defendants. 16

18 19 20 Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants County of Riverside and David Holm. ECF NO. 39. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Dismiss. 24 25 26 / / / / / / I. Background A. Factual Background1 The Court set out in detail the facts alleged in the Complaint in its Order Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 37 p. 2-3. As discussed below, Plaintiff Victor Sandoval (“Sandoval”) did not make any changes to the factual allegations in the SAC in his Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) besides attaching the Government Claim filed on February 3, 2022, and rejected by the County on February 7, 2022. ECF NO. 38 ¶ 2; 9…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.