Irwin Jacobwitz v. Rick Hawthorne

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20232:22-cv-04038California266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRWIN JACOBOWITZ, et al., CV 22-4038 DSF (KS) Plaintiffs, Order DISMISSING action for v. failure to prosecute and comply with Court Order RICK HAWTHORNE, et al., Defendants.

As the Court explained in its last Order (Dkt. 24), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated this Court’s prior orders denying Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status and dismissing the case, and remanded to allow Plaintiffs the opportunity to file an amended complaint. Jacobowitz v. Hawthorne, No. 22-55769, 2023 WL 4418594, at *1 (9th Cir. July 10, 2023). Accordingly, on September 5, 2023, this action case was reopened, Plaintiffs were granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and each Plaintiff was directed to either file a first-amended complaint or a notice of dismissal if they no longer wished to pursue the action. (Dkt. 24). The Court warned that failure to comply within thirty (30) days would result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. (Id.). To date, Plaintiffs have not complied or otherwise responded. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.