Curtis Andrews v. San Bernardino Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20235:23-cv-00928California868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. ED CV 23-928 DOC (MRW)

CURTIS ANDREWS,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff,

L.R. 7-12; FRCP

v.

SAN BERNARDINO POLICE

DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.

The Court dismisses this action due to Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the defense’s dismissal motions and court orders. * * * 1. This is a pro se civil rights action. In a complaint filed in May 2023, Plaintiff Andrews alleged that he suffered injuries in a car accident while in police custody. (Docket # 1.) 2. The Court dismissed the action as to the local police department, but allowed the action to proceed against the individual police officer named in the complaint as the driver of the vehicle. (Docket # 4.) The case was subsequently referred to the assigned magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings. 3. The defense moved to dismiss the action in July 2023. (Docket # 10.) Judge Wilner informed Plaintiff of his obligation to respond to the dismissal motion. (Docket # 11.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the motion. (Docket # 13 (notice of non-opposition).) 4. Judge Wilner then ordered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.