Alvaro Orosco v. Raul Angulo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20232:23-cv-08060California952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-08060-MEMF-AJR ALVARO OROSCO,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

RAUL ANGULO D/B/A TAQUERIA

RINCON ALTENO; STANLEY W.

ASHCRAFT, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ASHCRAFT FAMILY TRUST; and DOES 1 to 10,

Defendants.

On September 26, 2023, Plaintiff Alvaro Orosco filed a Complaint against Raul Angulo, Stanley W. Ashcraft, and DOES 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.