Theresa Brooke v. Chateau Property Holdings LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20232:23-cv-07306California945 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 Case No.: 2:23-cv-07306-MEMF-JC THERESA BROOKE,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD N OT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

CHATEAU PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC,

16 Defendant.

On September 4, 2023, Plaintiff Theresa Brooke filed a Complaint against Defendant Chateau Property Holdings LLC, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213, and (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq. The Complaint alleges that this Court has jurisdiction over the ADA claim pursuant 26 27 28 to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12188, and that the state law claims are brought “pursuant to

Arroyo v. Rosas, [where] supplemental jurisdiction is appropriate.” Id. at ¶¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.