Andrew Valles v. Kathleen Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20232:22-cv-05919California4,768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ANDREW VALLES, Case No. 2:22-cv-05919-GW-JC

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH v. LEAVE TO AMEND AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

RESPOND TO ORDER

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 I. SUMMARY On June 15, 2023, Plaintiff Andrew Valles, who is proceeding pro se and has been granted leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (“IFP”), filed the operative First Amended Complaint (alternatively, “FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), against California Governor Gavin Newsom; California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) Secretary Jeffrey Macomber; California Correctional Health Care Services (“CCHCS”) Receiver J. Clark Kelso; CDCR Director of Adult Institutions, Connie Gipson; Does 1-10; and the following CDCR or CCHCS employees who work, or worked, at the California Institution for Men in Chino, California (“CIM”): Warden John Merchant; Chief Deputy Warden Travis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.