Yesenia Pena v. City of Azusa

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20232:22-cv-07458California5,193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 || Mildred K. O'Linn (State Bar No. 159055) @manninglip-com 2 || Craig Smith (State Bar No. 265676) craig emit @omarningkass.com 3 || MANNING & KASS

ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP

4|/801 S. Figueroa St, 15" Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 5 || Telephone: Gb) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 6 Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF || AZUSA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 10 =| YESENIA PENA, individually and as Case No. 2:22-CV-07458 SB (MRWx) Successor in Interest to JESU 12 || FLORES, deceased; AMBER Magistrate Judge, Michael R. Wilner] TORRES, individually, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Plaintiffs, ORDER 614 v. (MRW VERSION 4/19) 15 CITY OF AZUSA, a municipal entity; Check if submitted without material 16 || and DOES through 10, inclusive,, modifications to MRW form 4 Defendant. 18 1. INTRODUCTION 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.