Daniel Govind v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20235:23-cv-01080California250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-01080-JFW(JC) Date: November 8, 2023 Title: Daniel Govind -v- State of California, et al.

PRESENT:

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None None

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PAY

FILING FEE

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP") under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). However, prisoners must still pay the filing fee but may do so through monthly installment payments if granted IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). On September 14, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff's IFP Request and directed him to pay the filing fee. (Dkt. 8). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.