Anu Duckworth v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20235:23-cv-01279California3,600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANU D., Case No. 5:23-cv-01279-KES

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v.

ORDER

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

I.

INTRODUCTION

On June 30, 2023, Plaintiff Anu D. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint for review of denial of social security disability benefits. (Dkt. 1.) Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s Brief (“PB”) under Rule 6 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Dkt. 14.) Defendant filed a responding Commissioner’s Brief (“CB”) under Rule 7. (Dkt. 15.) Plaintiff filed a timely Reply (“PRB”). (Dkt. 17.) For the reasons stated below, the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED. 28 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In January 2020, Plaintiff applied for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.