Dana Hughes v. Mandry Technology Solutions, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20232:23-cv-09502California681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-09502-JLS-MAR Date: November 16, 2023 Title: Dana Huges v. Mandry Tech. Solutions, LLC Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Gabby Garcia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE REMAND

Plaintiff Dana Hughes initiated this action against Defendant Mandry Technology Solutions, LLC in the Superior Court of California for Los Angeles County, alleging violations of the California Unauthorized Access to Computer Data Act (the “CUCA”). (State Court Compl., Doc. 1, Ex. A.) Mandry removed to this Court, invoking diversity jurisdiction. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Doc. 1.) The Court sua sponte questions its subject-matter jurisdiction and ORDERS Mandry to show cause as to why this case should not be remanded to state court because diversity jurisdiction’s amount-in- controversy requirement is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.