Michael White v. FBI

INTRODUCTION

20 On October 6, 2023, Michael White (“Plaintiff”), a California resident 21 proceeding pro se, filed a “Pleading Page For A Complaint,” construed as a 22 purported civil rights action (“Complaint”). (Dkt. 1 at 1.) The Complaint named 23 only the “FBI” as a Defendant. (Id.) 24 On October 19, 2023, the Court issued an order dismissing the Complaint 25 with leave to amend. (Dkt. 5.) On November 16, 2023, Plaintiff failed a “Request 26 27 28 (Dkt. 6.) The FAC again names only the FBI as a Defendant (“FBI” or 2 “Defendant”). (Id.) 3 4 II. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS IN THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT The rambling, garbled FAC is even more unintelligible than the original Complaint. From what the Court can decipher, the factual allegations of the FAC appear substantively identical to those in the original Complaint. Plaintiff alleges that he is being targeted by the FBI as a “Hebrew Israelite and not a Negro ethnic” for the past 34 years in violation of his First Amendment rights. (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff alleges that the FBI has committed the following on Plaintiff: attempted murder, …